Editor's Message


Keeping sustainability sustainable

By Anton John Crace

I think it goes without saying that sustainability is well within the minds of everyone in higher education and around the world at large. Most people in the sector would be hard pressed not to go a week without attending a conference, picking up a magazine, reading a blog, or looking at any piece of insights data that didn't touch on sustainability in some way. By my count, QS has held at least 10 different panels on the subject this year alone, with one summit dedicating itself to the topic in its theme, and this magazine itself carrying one article every issue, more or less, that was linked to sustainability.

All of this is not to congratulate ourselves on a job well done. Speaking and action are, of course, two very different things, and we should always be mindful that our conversations on sustainability are constructive, as we explored last year in "Asking the Wrong Questions" and "Asking the Right Questions". Instead, I wanted to reflect on the point of a special edition of QSIM focussing on the Sustainability Rankings.

Throughout the year, as we've spoken about sustainability in all its forms, the topic can start to become an afterthought; something added on after the fact. This might not be entirely surprising.

I began my career in international higher education in 2011, but it wasn't until the past few years that sustainability became a key talking point for the sector. Some of you might rightly point out that the UN's SDGs weren't adopted until 2016, and this would influence my perceptions. While it's true the SDGs were adopted in 2016, their inception links back four years earlier to the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro in 2012. Our understanding of climate change and inequality goes back even further.

The adoption of the SDGs was a landmark moment, not just in terms of scale, but as a literal point in time that we can look to for understanding how they changed our thinking. They also serve as a way of reminding ourselves the importance of and how we must continue reshaping our actions for sustainability. That, however, is not always enough, and while sustainability has become embedded in what we all do, it can lose context over time.

By no means is the 2024 QS Sustainability Rankings or this edition of QSIM as big and as important as the SDGs, but we hope both will reinvigorate and refocus your attention and provide new context to sustainability in higher education. Last year, in the Higher Ed Report for the pilot ranking, I likened sustainability to painting a bridge. If now, after a year, we're back to repainting that bridge again, let's look at the areas that need our attention. Is net zero enough? How are our students coping with climate change? What are sustainability-conscious employers looking for?

This is also a special double issue of QSIM to end the year, partly to align edition numbers with the months, but mainly because there has been so much going on that we didn't want you to miss. Issue 12, in the latter half of this magazine, is dedicated to the recent Asia Region Rankings and the QS Higher Ed Summit: Asia Pacific 2023.

It's a long road ahead and sustaining momentum can be testing. We hope this edition reenergises you.

Anton John Crace

Anton is Editor in Chief of QS Insights Magazine. He also curates the Higher Ed Summits, EDS and Reimagine Education conference at QS Quacquarelli Symonds. He has been writing on the international higher ed sector for over a decade. In 2019, he was recognised as the Universities Australia Higher Education Journalist of the Year in 2019 at the National Press Club of Australia, and won the International Education Association of Australia award for Excellence in Professional Commentary in 2018.