Latin America Supplement

Latin America does not lack talent. It lacks a talent system

Latin America has a coordination problem, and fixing that is the region’s real competitive opportunity.

By Roy Zúñiga, Vice President for Academic Affairs, INCAE Business School

Latin America Supplement

Latin America does not lack talent. It lacks a talent system

Latin America has a coordination problem, and fixing that is the region’s real competitive opportunity.

By Roy Zúñiga, Vice President for Academic Affairs, INCAE Business School

19 August 2026

In conversations with employers, students and academic leaders across Latin America, I keep encountering the same paradox. Employers tell me they cannot find the capabilities they need. Universities point — understandably — to new programmes and growing numbers of graduates. Governments invest in education, entrepreneurship and digital transformation.

Yet many talented young people still struggle to find work that matches their potential. Many eventually leave the region to find it elsewhere.

The QS World Future Skills Index 2027 captures an important part of this challenge. In several Latin American economies, demand for future capabilities is outpacing the capacity of education systems to supply them. The Inter-American Development Bank has likewise warned that the region carries significant foundational and digital skills gaps. These constrain productivity, innovation, social mobility and the creation of quality employment.

I do not believe Latin America lacks talent. I have seen too much evidence to the contrary: engineers who improvise solutions with limited resources; entrepreneurs who build in volatile markets; managers who navigate complexity as part of their daily work; and students whose ambition is anything but modest.

What we lack is a system that reliably does three things: recognise that talent, develop it, and link it to productive opportunity.

That distinction matters because it changes the remedy. If the problem were scarcity, the answer would be more programmes and more graduates. If the problem is coordination, the answer is different: shared signals about which capabilities matter, shared responsibility for building them and shared measures of success.

A country can have good universities, innovative companies and well-intentioned public programmes and still fall short, because no one is accountable for the outcome that matters — whether talent reaches productive work.

The disconnection takes several forms. Universities often design programmes using incomplete — or already outdated — signals from the labour market. Many companies still treat talent development as a human-resources activity rather than a strategic investment in future capabilities. Public policy tends to count enrolment, degrees and training places, but rarely follows the longer journey from learning to employment, productivity and social impact.

Here is the uncomfortable part: every actor can hit its own targets while the system as a whole underperforms. Progress therefore needs to be measured collectively, through outcomes such as graduate employment in high-demand sectors, cross-border mobility and employer satisfaction with skills. Otherwise, individual success risks masking regional failure.

From educational supply to shared capability building

The question shifts from how many graduates a country produces to whether the capabilities it builds match the problems it needs solved.

Employers can identify the capabilities they will need next year, bring live problems into the classroom and turn student projects into first jobs. Universities, in turn, must do more than respond to today’s job descriptions. Their responsibility is also to develop critical thinking, ethical judgment, adaptability and the capacity to learn — qualities that remain valuable when technologies and occupations change.

We need permanent feedback, not occasional consultation: joint skills observatories with published data; employer councils that review curricula every year; applied projects assessed by the firms that set them; and modular credentials graduates can stack when they return mid-career.

In earlier work on corporate universities, Camelia Ilie, INCAE´s President, and her colleagues argued that organisational learning creates value when it is explicitly tied to strategy. A country’s learning investments should reflect the capabilities it hopes to build.

Companies, for their part, cannot remain customers waiting at the end of an educational pipeline. They must help produce the talent they need. That means internships with real responsibilities, apprenticeships, mentoring, faculty collaboration and continuous reskilling — not only for senior executives, but across the workforce. It also means recruiting for potential — skills-based assessment rather than prior opportunity. Otherwise, firms reproduce the inequalities they expect education to solve.

Governments, meanwhile, should act less as isolated providers and more as architects of the ecosystem. Their most valuable contribution may be to publish trusted labour-market data, recognise credentials across institutions and borders and tie part of public funding to graduate employment rather than enrolment. That would let institutions, employers and learners see where opportunities are emerging and which capabilities lead to better work.

No single country in the region is large enough to build this alone. Cross-border degrees, shared research platforms and mutual recognition of credentials allow smaller systems to reach a scale none of them could fund individually.

Why the world should study Latin America

For international students, this transformation would make Latin America more than an affordable or culturally attractive destination. It would make the region a distinctive place to learn how to lead amid complexity. This is a living laboratory for renewable energy, biodiversity, sustainable agriculture, inclusive finance, urban innovation and entrepreneurship under constraint. We do not offer simplified cases. We offer real environments in which economic, social and environmental objectives collide — and must somehow be reconciled.

Leadership today must combine the local and the global, the analytical and the creative, excellence and humanity. This is precisely the educational proposition Latin America can offer the world. Students who come to the region should not encounter a peripheral version of education designed elsewhere. They should experience an education that is global in outlook and rooted in Latin America’s realities, knowledge and capacity for innovation.

No one can build this alone

After years of working in management education, I have become convinced that no single university, company, ministry or charismatic leader can secure Latin America’s future. Our progress will depend on something less dramatic but more durable: an architecture of collaboration that can survive electoral cycles, leadership transitions and short-term pressures.

Latin America already has the raw material: ambition, creativity, resilience and talent. What it needs now is connective tissue. Talent becomes innovation when it meets knowledge. It becomes productivity when it meets opportunity. And it becomes development when it is connected to purpose. Building those connections is not a secondary education policy. It is one of the most urgent economic — and moral — tasks facing our region.