
Opinion
As Gen Z redefines success, business education must keep pace
Gen Z is changing the rules of ambition. Business schools are uniquely placed to help companies listen — and to help graduates be heard.
By Delphine Manceau, Dean, NEOMA Business School

Opinion
As Gen Z redefines success, business education must keep pace
Gen Z is changing the rules of ambition. Business schools are uniquely placed to help companies listen — and to help graduates be heard.
By Delphine Manceau, Dean, NEOMA Business School
16 September 2026
Higher education has always been forward-looking, but the purpose of strategic foresight is changing as students communicate new priorities.
Traditionally, universities and business schools pay close attention to unfolding trends and future-of-work predictions in order to prepare graduates to thrive as the job market evolves.
While this remains important, institutions must increasingly demonstrate that they can also be forward-thinking in a new way. AI and new technologies, climate challenges and economic uncertainty are not just impacting the skills students need to be successful in the workplace. They represent fundamental changes in the way we approach business, creating ripe conditions for younger generations to redefine how they view success.
This means that the role of higher education must expand. Beyond equipping students with employable skills and fostering personal growth, business schools must also use their understanding of how young people’s aspirations are changing to act as a bridge between Gen Z and companies, helping both groups decode what the other wants.
This will help companies tailor their job offers, management practices and HR policies to attract and retain young talent. It will also help graduates navigate a fast-changing job market and identify work that matches their ambitions.
Business schools have the potential to play a leading role in current shifts, given our position within academia and our close ties to the corporate world.
Ambition has changed shape
So, what are young people striving for in their career choices? Which direction do their aspirations lead?
Deloitte Global’s 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey found that only six percent of Gen Z view reaching a senior leadership position as their primary career goal. Yet 76 percent say they would be interested in pursuing senior leadership at some point in their careers.
This is not a rejection of ambition. It reflects a different relationship to progression. 44 percent of Gen Z favour steady growth, while only 25 percent prefer rapid promotions. Stress, burnout and work-life balance also weigh heavily in how they assess leadership roles. Success increasingly combines professional development with stability and wellbeing.
Young generations are therefore asking employers a different question: not simply how quickly they can move up, but what they will learn, how they will contribute and whether their progress will be sustainable.
The skills that make AI useful
At business schools, our job is to work with the evolving definition of success so we can equip graduates with the skills they need.
Listening to employers is crucial for us to fulfil this role, as their perspectives often highlight which skills and competencies are key to unlocking the opportunities graduates aspire to.
Technical skills have become a prized asset as employers seek to harness AI’s potential. A 2025 Lightcast report, based on more than 1.3 billion job postings, found that roles mentioning AI skills offered a 28 percent salary premium. Demand is evolving quickly, but the premium signals how broadly employers value these capabilities.
Technological fluency is only part of the answer. The 2026 GMAC Prospective Students Survey shows that candidates and employers agree on the importance of strategic thinking and problem-solving. Employers place greater emphasis than candidates on initiative, coachability and emotional intelligence. These capabilities enable graduates to question an AI-generated answer, identify a weak assumption and decide when a tool should, or should not, shape a decision.
Taking these perspectives into account is important for business schools to ensure programmes help both students and employers connect around shared priorities.

What this means in practice
To put this role into practice, business schools must focus on three priorities.
First, combine technological fluency with knowledge and judgement. At NEOMA Business School, students learn how to use AI tools, but also when to question them. They must understand a subject well enough to identify hallucinations, weak premises or inappropriate recommendations.
We reinforce that judgement through the humanities. In a course exploring management and leadership through great literary texts, The Odyssey prompts a deceptively simple question: Ulysses reached Ithaca but returned without his crew. Can a project be called successful if its objective is achieved at that human cost? Such questions teach students to assess both results and responsibility.
Second, preserve the collective dimension of learning. In-person education matters because students learn by challenging one another, reading a room, resolving disagreements and building projects together. Digital tools can enrich this experience, but they cannot replace it. NEOMA’s collaborative spaces are designed to support formal teamwork as well as the informal exchanges from which new ideas and projects often emerge.
Third, expose students to real organisational situations, including those they cannot access physically. One NEOMA virtual-reality case takes students inside a nuclear power plant, a site a class could not ordinarily visit. Immersion turns an abstract case into a shared situation: students observe the environment, weigh constraints and discuss the consequences of their decisions.
Company challenges serve the same purpose when employers and students work on a real question together. Students gain a clearer view of operational expectations, while organisations see how younger talent approaches the problem.

A two-way responsibility
Business education has always looked ahead. Today, that requires more than anticipating which jobs and technologies will emerge. Schools must understand how expectations are changing on both sides of the labour market and act on that understanding.
Young people need technical fluency, but also knowledge, judgement and the ability to work with others. Employers need those same capabilities, while rethinking the management and HR practices that will attract a generation that defines progress differently.
Business schools are among the few institutions able to bridge these two transformations together and translate that into graduates, programmes and partnerships that actually work.
